Labels:book | daily | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: covery they already have that right in a forfeiture case, and the court can conTol the extent of a pre seizure hearing Although court has held that no prior notice or hearing were required when a yacht was seized for forfeiture Catero- Totedo 1 Pearson YachtCo. 416US 663 678 -80 (1974). that case presented entirely different issues than reai forfeiture The Catero Totedo court held that the government had an uverriding interest t se17e without prior rotice because rem jurisdiction could not attach the owner took the presented by prior notice sail away with the res Obtaining rem jurisdiction never problem real property case Even after a hearing he property will be there seized, and "seizure" can arcomplished simpty bi posting the property and leaving the process with the occupant without oth ...
(.png)
